1993 Audi S2 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Audi S2 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 329 more horse power than 1993 Audi S2. (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1993 Audi S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 442 kg more than 1993 Audi S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Audi S2. (350 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2011 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Audi S2.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Audi S2 | 2011 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S2 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 746 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |