1993 BMW 316 vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1993 BMW 316 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1979 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1993 BMW 316. (102 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1993 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 BMW 316 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 BMW 316. (151 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1993 BMW 316 | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 316 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |