1993 BMW 316 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1993 BMW 316 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1993 BMW 316. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1993 BMW 316.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 BMW 316 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1993 | 1992 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |