1993 BMW 316 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 BMW 316 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1993 BMW 316. (102 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1993 BMW 316.
Because 1993 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 BMW 316. (151 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1993 BMW 316 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 57 L |