1993 BMW 5.8 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 BMW 5.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 BMW 5.8 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 BMW 5.8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 BMW 5.8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 BMW 5.8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 BMW 5.8 (786 Nm) has 631 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 1993 BMW 5.8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo has automatic transmission and 1993 BMW 5.8 has manual transmission. 1993 BMW 5.8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 BMW 5.8 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 5.8 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5800 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
| Torque | 786 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2525 mm |
