1993 BMW 5.8 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 BMW 5.8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 BMW 5.8 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 BMW 5.8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 BMW 5.8 weights approximately 367 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 BMW 5.8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 BMW 5.8 (786 Nm) has 562 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 1993 BMW 5.8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 BMW 5.8 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 5.8 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5800 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 786 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2634 mm |
