1993 BMW 840 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1993 BMW 840 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 BMW 840 (283 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 BMW 840 weights approximately 254 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 BMW 840 (400 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 1993 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1993 BMW 840 | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | 840 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1993 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 4343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2750 mm |