1993 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 BMW M3 (281 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1993 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 BMW M3 (321 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1993 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 BMW M3 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | M3 | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2990 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 281 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 321 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
