1993 BMW M5 vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 BMW M5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 BMW M5 would be higher. At 3,795 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 BMW M5 (336 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC60. (217 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 196 kg more than 1993 BMW M5.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 BMW M5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (440 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 BMW M5. (400 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 BMW M5.
Compare all specifications:
1993 BMW M5 | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M5 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3795 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 336 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |