1993 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 690 kg more than 1993 Bristol Beaufighter.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Bristol Beaufighter | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Bristol | Land Rover |
| Model | Beaufighter | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2550 mm |
