1993 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Bristol Blenheim (228 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 119 kg more than 1993 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Bristol Blenheim (440 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1993 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Bristol Blenheim | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Bristol | Jeep |
| Model | Blenheim | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2774 cc |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 147 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1864 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2660 mm |
