1993 Bugatti EB 110 vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Bugatti EB 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Bugatti EB 110 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Bugatti EB 110 (553 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (261 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Bugatti EB 110 should accelerate faster than 2012 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Bugatti EB 110 weights approximately 310 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Bugatti EB 110 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Suzuki Equator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Bugatti EB 110 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Bugatti EB 110 (611 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Bugatti EB 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Equator. 2012 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1993 Bugatti EB 110 has manual transmission. 1993 Bugatti EB 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Bugatti EB 110 | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Bugatti | Suzuki |
| Model | EB 110 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 553 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 611 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 120 L | 80 L |
