1993 Buick Riviera vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Buick Riviera would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 474 kg more than 1993 Buick Riviera.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Buick Riviera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Buick Riviera | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Riviera | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1994 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1884 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
