1993 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Chevrolet Blazer (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda BT-50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chevrolet Blazer. (312 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3010 mm |