1993 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 300 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1993 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Camaro | 2000 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |