1993 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 455 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1993 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Camaro | 220 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
