1993 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1993 Chevrolet Camaro. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1993 Chevrolet Camaro.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chevrolet Camaro. (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Raider |
Year Released | 1993 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3340 mm |