1993 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Renault Clio

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 428 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1993 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Chevrolet Camaro 2006 Renault Clio
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Camaro Clio
Year Released 1993 2006
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3392 cc 1149 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 74 HP
Torque 271 Nm 105 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 69 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 76.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1413 kg 985 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2480 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14 L/100km 6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 50 L