1993 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 24 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1993 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Camaro | Condor |
Year Released | 1993 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |