1993 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2012 Renault Logan

To start off, 2012 Renault Logan is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2012 Renault Logan. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 248 kg more than 2012 Renault Logan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1993 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Logan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Logan. (112 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1993 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Logan.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Chevrolet Camaro 2012 Renault Logan
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Camaro Logan
Year Released 1993 2012
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3392 cc 1388 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 74 HP
Torque 271 Nm 112 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 70 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1413 kg 1165 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2910 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14 L/100km 7.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 50 L