1993 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1993 Chevrolet S-10. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1993 Chevrolet S-10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Chevrolet S-10 (319 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm). This means 1993 Chevrolet S-10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1993 Chevrolet S-10 has manual transmission. 1993 Chevrolet S-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chevrolet S-10 | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | S-10 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 212 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 216 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2710 mm |