1993 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 5,461 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (382 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1993 Chevrolet S-10. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1993 Chevrolet S-10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (530 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chevrolet S-10. (319 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chevrolet S-10. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R has automatic transmission and 1993 Chevrolet S-10 has manual transmission. 1993 Chevrolet S-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chevrolet S-10 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | S-10 | R |
Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 5461 cc |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 382 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3220 mm |