1993 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 3,499 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 860 kg more than 1993 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler Concorde | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | Concorde | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3499 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2800 mm |