1993 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Expedition weights approximately 946 kg more than 1993 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 2010 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler Concorde | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Concorde | Expedition |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3499 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 2526 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3023 mm |