1993 Chrysler ES vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 1993 Chrysler ES is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 240 (104 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Because 1978 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1993 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Chrysler ES | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | ES | 240 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |
