1993 Chrysler ES vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1993 Chrysler ES is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Because 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | ES | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1993 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 2235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3060 mm |