1993 Chrysler ES vs. 1999 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1999 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 360 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (366 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 1999 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Falcon |
Year Released | 1993 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |