1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
Model | ES | ESX 3 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 332 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3000 mm |