1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chrysler ES weights approximately 145 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | ES | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2680 mm |