1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Chrysler ES | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
| Model | ES | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2380 mm |
