1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2002 Lada 119
To start off, 2002 Lada 119 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Lada 119. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 119. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chrysler ES weights approximately 95 kg more than 2002 Lada 119. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 119. (129 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1993 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 119.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Chrysler ES | 2002 Lada 119 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lada |
| Model | ES | 119 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 129 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2500 mm |
