1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 775 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | ES | CLS |
Year Released | 1993 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 6208 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 166 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 102.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2860 mm |