1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 6 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |