1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 534 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | ES | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2891 mm |