1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (187 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (440 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Chrysler ES | 2012 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | ES | R |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5156 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1661 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3216 mm |
