1993 Chrysler ES vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 505 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler ES | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Mustang |
Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2720 mm |