1993 Chrysler Expresso vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1993 Chrysler Expresso is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Expresso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler Expresso | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Expresso | Mustang |
Year Released | 1993 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2750 mm |