1993 Chrysler Expresso vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1993 Chrysler Expresso is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler Expresso is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Expresso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler Expresso | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chrysler | DAF |
Model | Expresso | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1993 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2060 mm |