1993 Chrysler Expresso vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler Expresso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler Expresso would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Expresso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Chrysler Expresso | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
| Model | Expresso | CTS |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2880 mm |
