1993 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1993 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler Le Baron | 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Chrysler | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Le Baron | 6C |
Year Released | 1993 | 1940 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 77 L |