1993 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1993 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler Le Baron | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
Make | Chrysler | Hudson |
Model | Le Baron | Commodore |
Year Released | 1993 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3160 mm |