1993 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1996 Honda NSX
To start off, 1996 Honda NSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Honda NSX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Honda NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Honda NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Chrysler Le Baron | 1996 Honda NSX | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | Le Baron | NSX |
Year Released | 1993 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2977 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |