1993 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Chrysler | Smart |
| Model | Le Baron | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2370 mm |
