1993 Citroen Xantia vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Citroen Xantia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Citroen Xantia would be higher. At 1,579 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Citroen Xantia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Citroen Xantia (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Citroen Xantia should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Citroen Xantia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Citroen Xantia (130 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1993 Citroen Xantia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Citroen Xantia | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Citroen | Smart |
| Model | Xantia | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1579 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 72.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 81.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 2700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 1870 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 33 L |
