1993 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1993 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 930 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Daewoo Arcadia | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Daewoo | DAF |
Model | Arcadia | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1993 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3206 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1596 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3620 mm |