1993 Dodge Caravan vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1993 Dodge Caravan is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 75 kg more than 1993 Dodge Caravan.
Because 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Dodge Caravan | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Caravan | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1993 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2760 mm |