1993 Dodge Viper vs. 1982 Opel Manta

To start off, 1993 Dodge Viper is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Manta would be higher. At 8,001 cc (10 cylinders), 1993 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Dodge Viper weights approximately 61 kg more than 1982 Opel Manta.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Dodge Viper (1,112 Nm) has 1014 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Manta. (98 Nm). This means 1993 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Manta.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Dodge Viper 1982 Opel Manta
Make Dodge Opel
Model Viper Manta
Year Released 1993 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 8001 cc 1297 cc
Engine Cylinders 10 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 75 HP
Torque 1112 Nm 98 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1057 kg 996 kg


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]