1993 Fiat Panda vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1993 Fiat Panda is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1993 Fiat Panda. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1993 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 230 kg more than 1993 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Riley Kestrel (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Fiat Panda. (58 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Fiat Panda | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Fiat | Riley |
Model | Panda | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1993 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 58 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 25 L |