1993 Fiat Punto vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Fiat Punto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Fiat Punto would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Fiat Punto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Fiat Punto. (137 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Fiat Punto.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Fiat Punto | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
| Model | Punto | CTS |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2880 mm |
