1993 Fiat Tempra vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1993 Fiat Tempra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Fiat Tempra (75 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Fiat Tempra should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Fiat Tempra. (110 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Fiat Tempra.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Fiat Tempra | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Tempra | FX |
Year Released | 1993 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |